Generally, a restraint of trade or non-disclosure of information clause in a contract is a legal requirement. It is not always unreasonable. If it is, you should always consult an attorney, as he or she will be able to guide you through the legal landscape.
Legality
Restraints of trade and non-disclosure of confidential information are generally enforceable and are legal if they are reasonable and do not violate a person’s rights to free competition. Non-competition agreements typically appear in employment contracts and state that a person will not compete with the employer’s business. Such agreements are enforceable, but only if the reason for not competing is reasonable.
There are two main situations where trade restrictions apply. One is where an individual has a legitimate property interest in something. Trade secrets are a prime example of legitimate proprietary interests. Another scenario in which trade restrictions apply is when an employee hires another company and then competes with it. This example could be overly broad, limiting the freedom of any business.
If an employee breaches a non-disclosure agreement, the employer has the right to take action against that employee. A court will consider whether a restraint of trade is reasonable and whether it violates public policy. A restraint of trade can be enforced, but only if the employee proves that it is contrary to public policy.
Restraint of trade is an important legal issue in employment agreements. These agreements prevent employees from competing with former employers, typically within a geographical area. Moreover, they prevent former employees from soliciting clients, poaching staff, or passing sensitive information to new employers.
The courts have traditionally taken a narrow approach to enforcing restraint of trade clauses. Restraints of trade are enforceable only when the employer has legitimate business interests or reasonable measures to protect them. However, courts have recently been increasing enforcement of these clauses, particularly as the power of sophisticated employees increases. These former employees have strong bargaining power and can cause serious damage to the legitimate interests of their former employers.
A restraint of trade or non-disclosure of information clause is an important tool for protecting the business’s interests. These clauses are common in employment contracts and are often silent about the employer’s legitimate interests. These interests include confidential information, trade secrets, and a stable customer base.
Modifications to make clauses reasonable
Non-disclosure and restrictive trade clauses can often be unreasonably broad, which can be problematic for companies. In such a situation, it may be helpful to modify the restrictions in a non-disclosure clause to make it more reasonable.
Post-termination activities
A contract can contain certain restrictions that can be enforced after a job is terminated. Post-termination restrictions can protect an employer’s confidential information or prevent former employees from poaching other employees. Generally, these restrictions apply to employees who have held positions of leadership or have access to sensitive business information.
Post-termination restrictions should provide equal benefit to the employer and employee. Generally, a court will consider the nature of the employer’s legitimate interest when evaluating the reasonableness of a post-termination restriction. These interests can include trade secrets, goodwill, workforce stability, and confidential information. The employer must also prove that a post-termination restrictive covenant is reasonable based on its scope, duration, and geographic coverage.
There are different types of post-termination restrictions, but they usually prohibit the former employee from competing with the former employer’s products and services. For instance, a blanket non-compete clause prohibits an employee from engaging in competitive activities within the same industry, whereas an area restriction restricts the employee from competing with the employer in a particular geographical area.
Post-termination restrictions may also be enforced by the courts. However, the courts have to consider certain criteria in order to enforce the agreements. In some cases, the courts have found these agreements to be unreasonable. Therefore, it is important to remember that the courts are more likely to enforce post-termination restrictions if they are reasonable in all the circumstances.
Post-termination restrictions must be incorporated into the employment contract between the employer and the employee. This contract may be a contract of employment, a service agreement, or a separate collateral contract. Post-termination restrictions may be introduced at any stage – prior to termination or during termination – and must be incorporated properly. Moreover, the restrictions should meet all requirements of contract law, including offer, acceptance, and consideration.
Book a consultation with Nicola Le Roux at Le Roux Attorneys to take the next step. And, to keep up to date with all we offer, do follow us on social – LinkedIn and Facebook.
